The special article included in this number deals with the strengthening of rural groups and organisations, in particular with evaluation criteria used to measure the degree of organisational development. In this sense, the first part of this section lists a number of links of interest leading to resources related to this issue, whereas the second part features a bibliography organised around two broad subjects: (i) approaches to and guidelines for evaluation; and (ii) case studies, systematisations and evaluations. All the selected information is in Spanish.
UN System’s Network on Rural Development and Food Security
A global partnership to address the challenges faced by rural development at a national level, the website contains a number of resources such as publications, news, events, self-assessments, case studies and other resources on rural development (including rural organisation capacity-building experiences) and food security.
http://www.rdfs.net/index.htm
New Paradigm Network Project (RNP) – For Institutional Innovation in Latin America
The RNP network is an initiative promoted by ISNAR (International Service for National Agricultural Research) with the aim to build conceptual, methodological and cultural capacity for institutional innovation in research and rural development (R&RD). http://www.isnar.cgiar.org/npp/introduccion.html
IFAD’s Evaluation Office (EO)
The EO is responsible for monitoring and evaluating IFAD-supported interventions. This involves verifying the effectiveness of the policy and strategies implemented by their poverty relief programmes and projects to support rural populations. Their website contains methodological guidelines on evaluation, project evaluation, thematic evaluation and other resources, including research on capacity building for rural organisations.
http://www.ifad.org/evaluation/index.htm
Alliance for Agriculture Evaluation / FAO-SAGARPA Project
The Alliance for Agriculture Evaluation project is an effort jointly promoted by the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Nutrition of the Federal Government of Mexico and FAO. It is responsible for evaluating the Alliance’s Programmes for the promotion of peasant economic organisations, promotion of rural investment by producers, development of mechanisms to develop capacity among the rural population, strengthening the organisation of rural production units, etc. Their website features evaluation reports, including an analysis of rural organisations. http://www.evalalianza.org.mx/
International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR)
The IIRR is a rural development organisation with 80 years experience working in Africa, Asia and Latin America. The IIRR promotes a people-centered approach to development by building capacity among poor people and their communities. They work in Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning from rural communities. http://www.iirr.org/LatinAmerica/rgnlcenterlamerica.htm
(a) Approaches to and Guidelines on Organisational Evaluation
ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR IMPROVING PERFORMANCE
Charles Lusthaus, Marie-Hélene Adrien, Gary Anderson, Fred Carden and George Plinio Montalbán. Inter-American Development Bank and the International Development Research Centre, 200.
Beyond the organizational assessment framework, this book provides methodological tools and support to those interested in using it as a pattern to conduct organizational assesments. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-23987-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
ENHANCING ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A TOOLBOX FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT
Charles Lusthaus, Marie-Hélène Adrien, Gary Anderson and Fred Carden. International Development Research Centre (IRDC), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2001 (code: 2167).
This is a guidebook that describes a process for conducting organisational assessment. It is composed of four chapters and four appendices. The first three chapters address the main elements of the self-assesment process. Chapter four reviews the performance framework developed by the Universalia Management Group and IRDC, and includes a checklist and exercises for diagnosing organisational performance problems (Assessing Organizational Performance). http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-9370-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
(b) Case Studies, Systematizations and Evaluations
DIEZ CLAVES DEL ÉXITO PARA EL DESARROLLO RURAL
De Zutter, Pierre; Trivelli, Carolina; Sotomayor, César; Cavassa, Augusto; and Vergara, Ricardo. IFAD / FEAS, MARENASS, CORREDOR AND SIERRA SUR
This book (“TEN KEYS TO SUCCESS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT”) contains ten key chapters as guidelines for reflection, as an invitation to draw away from traditional approaches and view things from a new perspective, one that is more aware, more responsive to actual needs and practices, working with people who have succeeded in achieving sustainable impacts on the living conditions of poor rural communities and households in the southern Andean region of Peru.
http://www.preval.org/documentos/0a601.pdf
EXPERIENCIAS INNOVADORAS EN LOS PROYECTOS DEL FIDA EN LA REPÚBLICA DEL PERÚ. EVALUACIÓN TEMÁTICA
Simoni, Pietro, and Silveri, Paolo. IFAD, June 2004.
This thematic assessment (“Innovative Experiences in IFAD-supported projects in the Republic of Peru”) contains a detailed discussion of the innovative experiences supported by IFAD in Peru, identifying their particular characteristics, conceptual foundations and development relative to the results and impacts achieved. The evaluation methodology is focused on the analytical construction and identification of the impact of innovation at four different levels: i) analysis of available information, ii) field visits and field work, iii) surveys on relevant issues, and iv) presentation, analysis and regular discussion of the document. http://www.preval.org/documentos/0a600.pdf
DE LA SUBJETIVIDAD A LA OBJETIVIDAD: UNA EXPERIENCIA DE FORTALECIMIENTO DE CAPACIDADES CON ORGANIZACIONES DE PRODUCTORES
Garay Valenza, Carill and Ortiz Saravia, William. Centro de Teoría Rural (CTR) (code: 2168).
This document (“From Subjectivity to Objectivity: An Experience in Capacity Building with Producer Organisations”) describes experiences in capacity building with producer organisations developed with 18 rural organisations in Peru. The authors emphasize that the aim of the work is to show, based on an experience with producer organisations, the significance of working in rural areas through a training process to strengthen more effectively the capacity of civil society organisations (CSO).
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2168.pdf
CERRANDO BRECHA: MANUAL PARA ORIENTAR A ORGANIZACIONES RURALES HACIA LA EQUIDAD DE GÉNERO
IFAD, PROPESUR, PROGENERO, PRODERQUI, CODERSA AND PRODAP II, Guatemala 2003 (code: 2169).
This manual (“Closing the Gap: Orientation Manual for Rural Organisations towards Gender Equity”) presents a methodology with practical and simple tools to enable measuring the degree of gender equity achieved by a rural organisation. The methodology described includes a number of integrated tools to collect information both from the board and individual members and, based on this information, measure the degree of organisational development from a gender perspective. This technique may be used in any type of rural organisation.
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2169.pdf
FACTORES QUE DEBILITAN Y FORTALECEN LA FORMACIÓN DE ALIANZAS PARA EL DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE
Final Report – Systematization of the Project for the Promotion of Sustainable Development in the Microbasin of the Andaymayo River 1998 – 2000
Mori Díaz, Ever; Huerta Chombo, Luis; Ventura Quezada, Oscar; and Sagástegui Lozada, Wilson. Centro de Información y Desarrollo Integral de Autogestión, Sihuas (Ancash), Peru (code: 2172).
In this document (“Restraining and Enabling Factors for Building Partnerships for Sustainable Development”) the authors describe a systematisation experience of the Project for the Promotion of Sustainable Development in the Microbasin of the Andaymayo River 1998 – 2000. They explain the factors that restrain partnerships for development and those that enable and promote such partnerships. Although this document does not explicitly describe the criteria for assessing the strengthening of rural organisations, its thinking and findings will allow the reader to understand some of the issues that need to be reviewed or measured to assess the extent to which organisations are strengthened.
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2172.doc
SISTEMA DE EVALUACIÓN DE IMPACTO DEL PROYECTO DE APOYO AL DESARROLLO DE LA MICROEMPRESA RURAL. Colombia.
Villarraga, Jaime, 1998 (code: 00534).
This document (“Impact Evaluation System of the Project to Support the Development of Rural Microbusinesses”) outlines the process of developing an impact evaluation sub-system for rural microbusinesses promoted by the Project to Support the Development of Rural Microbusinesses (PADEMER). Chapter IV presents impact indicators developed based on each PADEMER component, which indicators allow to determine the characteristics of the degree of performance of microbusiness organisations in rural areas.
http://www.preval.org/documentos/00534.pdf
MANUAL DE CONSULTA PARA EL PROMOTOR DE GRUPO: UNA GUÍA PRÁCTICA PARA LA FORMACIÓN DE GRUPOS RURALES
Groverman, Verona (code: 00454).
This manual (“Manual for Consultation for the Group Promoter: A Practical Guide for the Building of Rural Groups”) describes how group promoters (GP), using a participatory approach, can help men and women in rural communities to gather in groups and work together to improve their income and living conditions; i.e., promote and strengthen organisations in rural areas. Chapter 4 provides a number of practical and simple guidelines for the implementation of participatory monitoring and evaluation processes for rural groups and organisations.
http://www.preval.org/documentos/00454.pdf
PODER LOCAL, PARTICIPACIÓN Y DESCENTRALIZACIÓN: LECCIONES APRENDIDAS DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA Y EXPERIENCIA DE ORGANIZACIONES LOCALES
Technical Assistance Regional Unit, RUTA Publication Series: Systematization of Experiences No. 16. Guatemala 2002 (code: 2230).
This document (“Local Power, Participation and Decentralisation: Lessons Learned from the Perspective and Experience of Local Organisations”) shows the results of the systematization of the following experiences: Community Development Association of Eastern Grain Growers (ADEGO), Pixan Konob’Association of Santa Eulalia Women for Integrated Development (Heart of the People) (AMEDIPK) and the Coalition of Associations and Organisations for Integrated Development (CASODI). This document contains an historical reconstruction and critical analysis of the experiences lived by the organisations under study. Based on these experiences, the research provides guidance on effective schemes and criteria for supporting sustainable processes of decentralisation and strengthening of participation, local power and the social fabric as inputs to feed into initiatives of different stakeholders interested in supporting development processes.
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2230.pdf
PERFIL INSTITUCIONAL RÁPIDO: UNA HERRAMIENTA PARA EL DESARROLLO ORGANIZACIONAL
Bruce, Moffat, PROARCA / COSTAS, Guatemala, 2001 (code: 2229).
This document (“Rapid Institutional Assessment: A Tool for Organisational Development”) presents a tool for assessing organisational development adjusted to the purposes of PROARCA/Costas. It describes 21 institutional indicators grouped into five broad categories: Leadership and Management, Programmes, Human Resources, Financial Resources, and Communications. This tool is useful to measure progress and impacts achieved in institutional development. The last part of the document elaborates on a case study in Gandoca, Bocas del Toro, Panama.
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2229.pdf
ALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURAL EVALUATION
The Alliance for Agricultural Evaluation Project is an effort promoted by the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Nutrition of the
Federal Government of Mexico and FAO. It is responsible for evaluating the Alliance’s Programmes for the promotion of peasant economic organisations, promotion of rural investment by producers and strengthening of the organisation of rural production units. This entity produces a number of evaluations outlining the methodological process in addition to showing results. Below is a list of external evaluation reports - along with their respective links - published by the Alliance for Agricultural Evaluation Project.
ALLIANCE FOR AGRICULTURAL EVALUATION 2005: NATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT - RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Nutrition of the Federal Government of Mexico and United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Mexico, September 2006 (code: 2231).
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2231.pdf
EXTERNAL EVALUATION: PROMOTING COFFEE PRODUCTION – RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES (2000)
Development Planning and Evaluation, S.C. (PLANEVADES), Government of Mexico through the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development (SAGAR) and the Government of the State of Jalisco (code: 2173).
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2173.doc
EXTERNAL EVALUATION: WOMEN IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT – RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES (2000)
Development Planning and Evaluation, S.C. (PLANEVADES), Government of Mexico through the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development (SAGAR) and the Government of the State of Jalisco (code: 2174).
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2174.doc
EXTERNAL EVALUATION: SUPPORTING RURAL DEVELOPMENT – RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES (2000)
Research, Training and Evaluation Unit for Rural Development, Civil Society (UNICEDER S.C.), Government of Mexico and the Government of the State of Jalisco (code: 2175).
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2175.doc
EXTERNAL EVALUATION: TRAINING AND EXTENSION – RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES (2000).
Research, Training and Evaluation Unit for Rural Development, Civil Society (UNICEDER S.C.), Government of Mexico and the Government of the State of Jalisco (code: 2176).
http://www.preval.org/documentos/2176.doc